Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Water Crisis & Water Conservation Practices: Post # 34


Water Conservation Practices


Water conservation is the minimization of water loss or wastage as well as the preservation, care and protection of water resources and efficient and effective use of water. As water conservation practices include saving of water when excessive amount is available and / preserving of water made available because of water supply and demand management, it is, therefore, a key in managing water crisis under any context.

In general, water crisis is a term that refers to the scarcity and quality of available water resources relative to human demand. However, in the Pakistani context, the definition of water crisis changes to a phenomenon that has to deal with either dealing with too much of flood water over a shorter span of time, causing deaths and destruction as is happening at present, as well as facing a perpetual threat of survival because there is too little water over an extended period.  Of course, water quality remains a serious its concern and essential component in either case.

To address water crisis, merely increasing water availability through water supply management and  reducing water consumption through  water demand management are probably not sufficient measures unless we create conditions that allow extra water available, either through improving supplies or by reduction in water demand, to be conserved for additional uses or preserved for future needs. In other words, water conservation practices are an integral component of overall water management as well as water crisis management.

In general, efficient and effective use of water concerns the end-users of water. We have a great knowledge base for water conservation at users’ level when we look at say domestic and industrial sub-sectors of water use. In these cases, new ideas and innovations have been practically implemented to show how surplus water can be secured within existing supplies for additional water users. For the last four decades, we have made concerted efforts do similar water management in the irrigated sector of Pakistan but with limited success.

Of course, the irrigated agriculture sector uses by far the majority of available freshwater, around 90-97 % in our local context. If proper conditions are created for effective water demand management and water conservation for the end-users, there is a vast potential of sparing huge quantities of freshwater for either bringing additional areas under cultivation or increasing cropping intensities within limited landholdings.

Pakistan has made tremendous progress in creating conducive conditions for demand side water management at the users’ end. Since the early seventies, different water management projects have been undertaken. To improve water use efficiency, the following few important innovative activities have been tried:
  • Watercourse lining / improvements to improve water conveyance efficiencies;
  • Precision land leveling first by manual control and then by LASER to eliminate local undulations within fields to enhance irrigation efficiencies;
  • Introduction of better designed gravity irrigation application methods (like level basin-borders, basin-furrows and bed-and -furrows) to avoid over irrigation that usually occurs under traditional field flooding methods,  occurring particularly at the start of the irrigation season;
  • Experiments are being conducted to introduce pressurized irrigation methods like the drip water application technique for point irrigation aimed at further water saving by limiting the area to be watered;
  • Promotion of zero-tillage to save time, energy and water in areas such as the wheat-rice zones;
  • Demonstration of packaged improvements like watercourse lining, land leveling, proper design of water application method, precision crop planting, use of high yielding seeds, proper fertilizer applications and irrigation scheduling for many times higher water productivity; and
  • Treatment of dominantly sodic groundwater either to apply exclusively or to augment canal water supplies for a safer additional source for irrigation.
Of course, over the last four decades, there have been well-intended efforts to save water by improving water use efficiency at the lower-end of the irrigation system in this country. Watercourse lining activity has been implemented at the national level to reduce head-tail differences by increasing water supplies along the improved conveyance systems. Similarly, even at a limited scale, precision land leveling controlled by LASER technology is making its existence felt. Other stated activities could not go beyond testing and trial stages.

In view of the awareness created and acceptance of new innovative ideas for efficient water use, there is a need to move on to the next stage where water use projects or programs are designed to a) deliver outputs either in the form of visible water savings, b) conserve water physically for later use, or c) enhance productivity and profitability per unit of water allocated to the farmers, where conservation utility gets translated into additional outputs.

In the first case, we need to have either on-farm or off-farm water storages to see physical savings.  Furthermore adjustments to water rights can be made where saved and stored water is allowed to be traded to create a market for delivering adequate amounts of water for growing crops in the vicinity and other non-agricultural uses. Unless we conserve through visible and tangible water savings, these supply side and demand side improvements will remain hearsay and hence, remain invisible water savings or dry water savings as stated by a water expert of International Water Management Institute.

In the second case, by implementing the whole package of required inputs of higher crop productivity, we secure results of improved water use efficiency by the end-users to enhance profitability per unit water applied at a farm or field level. This appears to be an abstract type of water conservation but closer scrutiny reveals it to be very tangible in terms of higher productivity per unit of water delivered. However, there cannot be enhanced water productivity if we remain emotionally attached to the old wild flooding irrigation systems? In short, water demand management by improving water use efficiency in agriculture must deliver tangible outputs that are very visible and solid for everyone to see and acknowledge. The stated target is only achievable if water conservation practices remain an integral part of water management.

There are other more sophisticated ways to conserve water by reducing or eliminating water demand for crops in our environment of water scarcity: Why can’t we consider importing virtual water as Israel did 50 year back? If Israel can decide in 1960 not to grow cereal crops by importing cereals to buy in virtual water; why can’t we do the same? Why not go for additional measures like either dropping or replacing tropical crops with those crops that suit our arid environment and demand less water?

Gigantic challenges demand daring policies aimed at a paradigm shift to a kind of agriculture that suits an arid and semi-arid environment with scarce water resources. If Israel can buy-in virtual water almost equivalent to twice the amount of freshwater available in the country, what would it mean for Pakistan if the stated water and crop choices are made a part of a new enforceable water conservation policy to meet the challenges of the emerging water crisis? It is mind-boggling even to think of the water savings that could result.

Wiser and proactive nations initiate activities that may materialize in years to come. For example, for water conservation to become a reality, water demand management requires effective control for a measured amount of water to be delivered to water users. Sooner we start pilot testing such ideas, the better it would be to manage emerging water crisis effectively. 

No comments:

Post a Comment